Beyond all these issues, it is also extremely important for all business owners to know that they can't know everything. By definition, business is always a risky venture. The best way to quantify the risk is, when appropriate, to rely on other people for advice and consultation. Every business, for example, should have a working relationship with a lawyer, an accountant, an insurance agent and a banker.
It likewise makes sense to delegate out certain job functions when it is either cost effective to do so (for example, payroll services) or when it helps to spread the risk of your business enterprise (for example, subcontracting out part of a project when someone else will assume the risk of doing a comparable job at a cheaper price).
The time tested legal entity to use when forming a business enterprise is the corporation. A corporation is a legal entity that the law treats as a "person" in the sense that the organization has its own corporate identity and existence. As a separate legal entity, a corporation serves as a shield between the owners and third parties doing business with the organization. So long as corporate formalities are observed, the corporate shield makes it difficult for third parties to "pierce the corporate veil" to go after the owners. Instead, creditors and other third parties can be limited to going after the assets of the corporation. A corporation also has its' own name and identity separate from the owners. It pays taxes and has the ability to contract. It can own property. A corporation can sue and be sued. In some instances, a corporation can be charged with and convicted of crimes.
Another alternative is a partnership. A partnership is an arrangement involving two or more people undertaking a business venture as co-owners, with the intent to make a profit. The simplest type of partnership entity is known as a general partnership. Forming a general partnership is the easiest way to go into business with another person. But the simplicity of a partnership can be a problem, so careful planning is important. One of the principal drawbacks of a general partnership is that a general partner can be held responsible for all debts and liabilities of the partnership. Thus, a general partner with only a one percent interest in a business could still be held liable for 100% of the debts and liabilities of the partnership. From a tax standpoint, it's sometimes better to invest in a partnership rather than incorporating.
In order to address the issue of potentially unlimited personal liability, most states also recognize another type of business entity that is called a limited partnership. A limited partnership must have at least one general partner, but all of the other investors can be limited partners whose potential liability exposure can usually be limited to the extent of that partner's investment. So, for example, if a limited partner invests $10,000 in a business venture organized as a limited partnership, his or her potential liability would be limited to the $10,000 invested rather than the rest of the limited partner's personal assets. One of the resulting tradeoffs, though, is that an investor must take a passive role in the operation of the business in order to maintain the status of a limited partner. In many ways, a limited partner is comparable to a shareholder in a corporation.
Another business entity is the limited liability company. This type of business entity is perhaps best described as a hybrid of a corporation and a general partnership. It's treated as a corporation for limited liability purposes but as a general partnership for tax purposes. The owners are called "members." Unlike a shareholder or a limited partner, they don't have to take a passive role in the business
Yet another alternative for a business entity that is sometimes overlooked is a non-profit corporation. Just because a business is non-profit doesn't mean that it can't make money. If you think your business idea might be able to operate as a non-profit entity, this is something you would want to discuss with your attorney.
The biggest benefit to operating as a sole proprietorship is its simplicity. You're your own boss and don't have to worry about many of the rules and regulation that apply to corporations and other types of business entities. You don't have to worry about filing separate tax returns. In theory, you don't even need to keep separate books and records for your business.
However, the simplicity of a sole proprietorship can also be a business owner's worst enemy. Why? Because a sole proprietorship doesn't give any protection against the inherent risks and potential liability exposure of running a business. Creditors are free to go after not only the assets of the business but also all of your personal assets, such as bank and savings accounts, land holdings, investments, heirlooms and household furnishings. So if you operate as a sole proprietor, you'll want to try to protect your assets through insurance, homesteading a residence, retirement accounts and perhaps eventually bankruptcy.
Many sole proprietors operate their businesses with a false sense of security that insurance provides them with adequate protection against the perils of personal liability exposure. To the contrary, there are many risks that are typically not covered by insurance, such as damages for breach of contract and claims arising out of an employment relationship (like sexual harassment or wrongful termination).
It's not always an easy process to form and maintain a corporation, as there are many formalities that must be followed. There are also costs in forming and maintaining a corporation that can be avoided if you choose to operate as a different type of business entity. For example, most states charge a "franchise" tax every year for the benefit of operating and maintaining a corporation in the state, regardless of whether the corporation has taxable income. And state laws generally require that a corporation maintain an organizational structure that includes directors, officers and shareholders.
The biggest benefit of incorporating is that it provides the owners (the stockholders) with a shield against potential liability exposure. The protection isn't absolute, but it may be the best protection against personal liability exposure you can get in today's business world. And a business owner can take advantage of certain tax laws by operating through a corporation. It may also be possible to provide better employee benefits through a corporation. In addition, it may be possible to deduct certain business expenses when operating through a corporation that might not be as easy to justify or to validate if operating as one of the other types of business entities.
While it is almost always preferable to put things in writing, the law doesn't require that there be a written agreement in order to find that there is a legally binding partnership. Indeed, many people find themselves on the wrong end of a legal dispute because they went into a partnership without clearly defining their business relationship. Partnerships, like marriages, are easy to get into but hard to get out of.
Partnerships are perhaps the easiest and simplest way to go into business with another person. But the simplicity of a partnership can be its downfall, so careful planning is important. Partners should have a clear understanding as to why they're entering into a partnership instead of some other business entity.
One particular benefit to a partnership is that it's not a tax-paying entity. While a partnership must file its own tax returns, the profits and losses from the partnership are passed through to the partners. At the same time, however, the tax and accounting rules that deal with partnerships can be exceedingly complicated.
One of the principal drawbacks of a partnership is that it doesn't protect against potential liability exposure any more than a sole proprietorship. A general partner, for example, can be held 100% responsible for the debts and liabilities of the partnership. This is usually true with a general partnership even though a given partner may have only a minority interest therein. So a general partner with only a one percent interest in a business could still be held liable for 100 percent of the debts and liabilities of that partnership.
The tradeoff is that limited partners must take a passive role in the operation of the business in order to maintain such a status. In many regards, a limited partner would be comparable to a shareholder in a corporation.
The LLC is a creature of statute that, in relative terms, has only come into existence in recent years. Thus, the business world is not entirely familiar with the LLC mode of operation (as evident by the fact that even sophisticated investors will refer inaccurately to an LLC as a "limited liability corporation"). An LLC isn't a corporation and doesn't have shareholders, nor does it have to have directors or officers. Instead, the owners are called "members" and one or more "managers" make the day-to-day decisions of the business. You file "Articles of Organization" when forming an LLC. An "operating agreement" governs the affairs of the organization (rather than articles of incorporation and bylaws, as with a corporation).
In many instances, an "S" corporation may also be the better way to go. From a practical standpoint, corporations have been around a lot longer than LLC's. People you're going to deal with in the business world will be more familiar with the "S" corporation. In fact, in some lines of business, you may not even be able to operate as an LLC. Overall, the "rules of the road" for corporations are better defined than they are for LLC's, and people are more familiar with them.
However, there are significant limitations to an "S" corporation. In general, all shareholders have to be individuals, and this can be a significant drawback when some of your investors want to invest through business entities, retirement plans or other investment vehicles. The number of shareholders is also limited to 75 or few individuals, and there can be only one class of stock. "S" corporations must also use a calendar year for tax reporting purposes. The rules for making an "S" election and preserving the "S" status of the corporation can be complicated.
Many new business owners choose to purchase a franchise business because of the assistance they can get from a company with experience in the business. If you purchase a franchise from a reputable franchise company, the risks of opening a business may be significantly less than starting a new business "from the ground up."
Generally, the franchisee will pay an up-front fee as well as continuing fees based on the dollar amount of goods or services sold. The franchisor trains the franchisee and provides market research to determine a favorable location for the business. The franchisor typically has strict rules and standards as to how business is conducted, the goods and services to be sold and the design and construction of the business location.
Each state has strict rules and regulations on franchises. Generally, franchisors must comply with strict disclosure requirements, so that people are fully aware of what they are getting into before they sign up to buy a franchise business. If you're looking at buying a franchise, you should be sure that it has been properly registered. You should also be very careful to read and understand all the documentation given to you.
Businesses are always going to be subject to market risks from competition and the economy in general. From a legal perspective, though, the problems that most often seem to bring down a business would include:
When you are going into business, you usually don't think about the risks of going out of business if the enterprise fails. Once a business is in trouble, though, many of these risks come back to the forefront in terms of whether you will ultimately be able to avoid bankruptcy. The risks include the possibility of personal liability exposure for the following:
All of these risks only underscore the need for proper planning before you go into business. This planning should include using the right business entity to shield you from the potential liabilities of operating a business.
Failing to pay payroll taxes is a classic example of where many businesses get into trouble. As an employer, a business has the responsibility for withholding certain taxes from an employee's paycheck (for example, income tax withholdings, social security, federal and state unemployment and disability taxes). These amounts are not the employer's money and the employer is responsible for collecting them on behalf of the government. The IRS and other tax authorities are very unforgiving about failing to pay over these withholdings in a timely manner. In addition, the employer is responsible for the business's portion of social security and other payroll taxes that must also be paid on time. If the employer fails to pay in these taxes and withholdings, penalties can be assessed against the owners and/or managers of the business up to 100% percent of the amounts owed.
The disadvantages of independent contractors include:
Different governmental agencies use different tests for deciding when someone is an independent contractor versus an employee.
Internal Revenue Service
Of most concern is the IRS, which has developed a 20-factor test for determining whether someone is an employee for whom you must pay payroll taxes:
Do you have the right to control how the worker does the work?
Do you have financial control over the worker?
How do you and the worker see your relationship?
The presence of these factors makes it more likely that the IRS will consider the worker an employee rather than an independent contractor for tax purposes.
State Agency Tests
State laws vary as to when a worker is considered an employee versus an independent contractor for unemployment compensation, workers' comp and state tax purposes.
Some state agencies use what's called an economic reality test that focuses on how economically dependent the worker is on the hiring business.
In many states, unemployment compensation laws follow what's called the ABC test, which focuses on:
When You Want to Hire an Independent Contractor
To make sure you're actually hiring an independent contractor:
Q:
What do I need to know if I am going into business for myself?
Return to index . . .
Q:
What form of business entity should I use?
Return to index . . .
Q:
What are the pros and cons of a sole proprietorship?
Return to index . . .
Q:
What are the pros and cons of a corporation?
Return to index . . .
Q:
What's an "S" corporation?
Return to index . . .
Q:
What are the pros and cons of a partnership?
Return to index . . .
Q:
Is a limited partnership any different?
Return to index . . .
Q:
So what is a limited liability company and how is it different from a limited partnership?
Return to index . . .
Q:
Why not just use an "S" corporation instead of a limited liability company?
Return to index . . .
Q:
What is a franchise?
Return to index . . .
Q:
What are some of the most common mistakes that people make when they go into business for themselves?
Return to index . . .
Q:
What are some of the major risks in running a business?
Return to index . . .
Q:
What kind of tax liabilities do I have to worry about in my business?
Return to index . . .
Q:
Can I avoid payroll tax issues by hiring independent contractors?
Employee Versus Independent Contractor
a statutory lien on property for taxes due giving the taxing authority a security interest in the property
More Legal News